Following His Footsteps: “Master Storyteller” (Part One) – Luke 14

garrison keillorI didn’t grow up in the upper Midwest, and I have only been to Minnesota and Wisconsin a few times. In fact, thinking about it, I have never been in Minnesota during any season but winter. You cannot prove by my experience that anything grows in that state except house plants and hotel lobby plants – but that surely isn’t the case. If you DID grow up in Minnesota, I am certain that you have heard of the fictitious Lake Woebegone and it her favorite traveling minstrel, Gary Edward “Garrison” Keillor, who entered the real world of Minnesota in 1942, and grew to be the author, storyteller, humorist, and radio personality that he is today. He is probably best known as the host of the Minnesota Public Radio show “A Prairie Home Companion”.

If you have ever heard his voice, you know he is a world-class storyteller. Only the Irish come close to his talents in regard to spinning a saga. He has the ability to weave a tale about virtually nothing, and make it fascinating and funny. I am captivated by his homespun humor, but in this lesson I am focused on his storytelling ability. After following years of his radio persona, I have come to the conclusion that I am only now beginning to understand some of his humor – because it is rooted in specific knowledge of the culture of the upper Midwest that I simply didn’t understand. The more I understand about that culture, the funnier his references become. His humor is developed, at time at a very high level. The problem for the longest time wasn’t him – it was me. I just didn’t know what I needed to know to “get” what he was saying. I mention that, because it strikes me that the same problem exists for many Christians listening to Jesus as the Master Teacher that is reflected in the Gospels.

As we look more deeply into the teachings of the Master during His extended trip through Perea late in His earth ministry, listening to the parables becomes very important. Many a wrong theology came from a poor listener, who taught from the Bible with the confidence they were teaching truth – but close inspection shows those insights to be imposed on the Gospel account, not pulled from it. Nowhere is that problem more evident than in the teachings we will explore in this lesson. Here is the key we need to keep in mind….

Key Principle: You have to know the teacher to understand His message.

In order to truly understand the message, the hearer should understand the culture and teaching method of the speaker. If the teacher’s background is a mystery, the teachings they offer will be only vaguely understood.

I want to be honest and make clear to you that the key principle is normally a spiritual lesson that I derive FROM the text – and it is usually what I believe to be the underlying truth that binds the story together. For this lesson, I am deliberately doing some differently. In this case, the key principle is designed to “hover over the text” to help us make the words more clear. I recognize that means we need to take extra care here so that we don’t impose ideas on the narrative, but I believe every student of the Word will recognize the benefits of recalling the parables and teaching of Jesus in the way they were conveyed and interpreted by His original audience so long ago, as best we are able.

The Lesson of the Seating Chart (Luke 14:7-14)

Jesus was teaching at a banquet, where He was expected to offer insight while reclining beside a table, as that was the custom. The host was eager, and the guests were their to evaluate the teacher. Luke recorded:

Luke 14:7 And He [began] speaking a parable to the invited guests when He noticed how they had been picking out the places of honor [at the table], saying to them, 8 “When you are invited by someone to a wedding feast, do not take the place of honor, for someone more distinguished than you may have been invited by him, 9 and he who invited you both will come and say to you, ‘Give [your] place to this man,’ and then in disgrace you proceed to occupy the last place. 10 “But when you are invited, go and recline at the last place, so that when the one who has invited you comes, he may say to you, ‘Friend, move up higher; then you will have honor in the sight of all who are at the table with you. 11 “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.” 12 And He also went on to say to the one who had invited Him, “When you give a luncheon or a dinner, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or rich neighbors, otherwise they may also invite you in return and [that] will be your repayment. 13 “But when you give a reception, invite [the] poor, [the] crippled, [the] lame, [the] blind, 14 and you will be blessed, since they do not have [the means] to repay you; for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous.”

There are five important things I would like you to notice about the instruction:

The Setting: Both the instruction and the parable that followed it were given at a villa banquet, and directed at the invited guests, people of some importance and distinction, while other uninvited guests watched from the atrium of the home (14:7a).

The Cause: The Master gave the instruction after He noticed how people chose their seats around the table (14:7b).

The Truth: Jesus told the men not to choose a place that was highly important, because it created embarrassment when one who was more important entered, and left them moving to a lesser place. At the same time, that was the opening, not the main teaching (14:8-10).

The Teaching: Those who believe they are very important will find that others do not take their place seriously, but those who see others as more important than themselves will find that others show them greater honor. The way to be important to people is serve them.

The Instruction: Serve those who no one else is serving. Show love to those who have so little that they will know you did not do it for pay. God loves mercy and humility, and will not forget your deed.

In the world of the first century in the Judea and the Galilee, the customary presentation of a guest to a room mixed with scholars and seeker was the norm. Jesus interrupted the flow by teaching – not in vast generalizations – but in specific admonitions to those at the banquet table. That was different, but not entirely unheard of. What was difficult was the suggestion that they were not men of proper attitude. Insulting people never endears them to you. Jesus was making a point – and that was more important than making new friends in that room.

People of status have a tendency to spend their time with people of similar or greater rank. They see life, many of them, as a climb to the top – with many left beneath them in the end. They pass by hurting people, and consume their wealth on themselves, surrounded by other “beautiful people” – the people who have their problems well-hidden beneath coats of cosmetic paint and fancy clothes. It isn’t their wealth that makes them insensitive – it is their choice to use it to promote self instead of helping those who have greater need. The self-fixation is the real issue.

Let’s say it plainly: Jesus wants His followers to see themselves as less important than those around them. He wants His disciples to reflect humility and sensitivity. It is at the heart of His call and cannot be ignored if we are to be obedient to Him

The Parable of the Big Dinner (Luke 14:15-24)

When they heard Jesus’ words, they weren’t sure how to react. One man made clear that he expected to be a part of the kingdom of God, and knew that he would be happy to do so. He called from the table side:

Luke 14:15 When one of those who were reclining [at the table] with Him heard this, he said to Him, “Blessed is everyone who will eat bread in the kingdom of God!”

The truth is, that was a quiet repudiation of the words Jesus had just uttered. No one at the table believed that blind, lame and poor were going to be ushered to seats of greatness by the Creator. After all, if He thought highly of them, why were they suffering now?

Luke recorded the parable Jesus offered in response to that thinking:

Luke 14:16 But He said to him, “A man was giving a big dinner, and he invited many; 17 and at the dinner hour he sent his slave to say to those who had been invited, ‘Come; for everything is ready now.’ 18 “But they all alike began to make excuses. The first one said to him, ‘I have bought a piece of land and I need to go out and look at it; please consider me excused.’ 19 “Another one said, ‘I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I am going to try them out; please consider me excused.’ 20 “Another one said, I have married a wife, and for that reason I cannot come.’ 21 “And the slave came [back] and reported this to his master. Then the head of the household became angry and said to his slave, ‘Go out at once into the streets and lanes of the city and bring in here the poor and crippled and blind and lame.’ 22 “And the slave said, ‘Master, what you commanded has been done, and still there is room.’ 23 “And the master said to the slave, ‘Go out into the highways and along the hedges, and compel [them] to come in, so that my house may be filled. 24 For I tell you, none of those men who were invited shall taste of my dinner.'”

We might be able to pick out three parts of this parable of Jesus.

First, there was the initial invitation that met rejection. The man made preparations and invited the usual guests, but they offered excuses and didn’t respond to the invitation to come (14:15-20).

Second, there was the startling new invitation that met delight. When the slave that brought the invitation to the invited guests returned and told the man his invitations were turned down, the man didn’t cancel the banquet and toss the food, he decided to bring guests that were unlikely and normally uninvited (14:21). The slave obeyed, and each was brought to the banquet, but there was yet more room (14:22).

Finally, there was explanation that explained what the man was doing. The slave was told to go out and find anyone to fill the seats, because he did not want those who rejected his invitation to show up later and think a seat was waiting for them (14:23-24).

The point of the story is that some imagine themselves to be so important, their expectation becomes presumption. The man who thought he would be in the kingdom of God’s great banquet hall with the lame and blind left out did not understand what God was looking for inside those with whom He would work. God doesn’t need our vast confidence, only our commitment to follow Him when He calls. God doesn’t see our qualifications as our attraction point – because He knows our frame. He doesn’t work with us, or even desire to work in and through us, because of our accomplishments, our reputation or our potential. He calls us because He loves us. He wants us because He made us. It isn’t our beauty, our personality or our ability that He uses to draw us in – it is our neediness, our bankruptcy. God resists those who think they are good enough, but offers special favor to those who know their own brokenness and often seek His repair.

Every follower of Jesus, especially after we have followed for some time and have some “accomplishments for the Kingdom” under our belt, needs to heed the warnings of Jesus about attitude from this parable. We don’t have God because we deserve Him. We aren’t invited because we are better. We shouldn’t put God on “hold” because we have essential commitments that call us to do something BEFORE we get to deal with Him and His great invitation.

Jesus’ parable likely referred to the fact that the contemporary generation of Jewish leaders – those who delivered Him into the hands of Pilate and the Romans – would be set aside for a future generation of Jews, who would one day behold Him and know they need Him. Zechariah foretold:

Zechariah 12:8 “In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the one who is feeble among them in that day will be like David, and the house of David [will be] like God, like the angel of the LORD before them. 9 “And in that day I will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem. 10 “I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

The Apostle Paul explained that day had not yet come, but he anticipated it to come in the future:

Romans 11:1 “I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? May it never be! …11 I say then, they did not stumble so as to fall, did they? May it never be! But by their transgression salvation [has come] to the Gentiles, to make them jealous. 12 Now if their transgression is riches for the world and their failure is riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their fulfillment be!…18 do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, [remember that] it is not you who supports the root, but the root [supports] you…21 for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either. 22 Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off….25 For I do not want you, brethren, to be uninformed of this mystery– so that you will not be wise in your own estimation– that a partial hardening has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in; 26and so all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, “THE DELIVERER WILL COME FROM ZION, HE WILL REMOVE UNGODLINESS FROM JACOB.”

Essentially, Jesus made plain the great sin of presumption he heard from the man at the banquet. The man PRESUMED he would be called to be a part of the kingdom and its feasting – for God had so blessed Him in THIS life. He knew the “little people” were on the roadway – the hurting, the broken, the physically destroyed. They were the “other people” – those pitiful unfortunates that did not see the hand of blessing in this life that God had showered on him and his family. They were not blessed – and he presumed there must be a reason. Like Job’s friends, his theology allowed for blessing of the beloved and curse of the broken… and he was wrong.

Jesus made clear that people don’t have God’s blessing in the material world because we deserve it. Others in our world that struggle with extreme deprivation aren’t in that state because they don’t deserve what we have. There are many reasons for their lack and our abundance. The one thing Jesus made clear is that none of us can claim we have what we have because we are the deserving. Blessing is not God’s paycheck. Ease is not the stamp of God’s approval. Some who were approved of God in the text of Scripture struggled deeply and consistently – while many of those who lived in ease and relative comfort walked far from God. Despite what some have preached over the airwaves, Jesus made it abundantly clear that there is simply no fixed correlation between ease and righteousness, between material prosperity and God’s approval. Many who followed God throughout history found themselves wounded for doing do, while many who “blew through” accumulated material possessions didn’t even know God. Blessing in the coming kingdom cannot simply be measured by those who have much in the current earthly domain.

Some believers, sitting on dirt-floored huts in desolate villages, will enjoy great reward in the kingdom ahead – not because they were poor, but because they followed God greatly in spite of the fact they could not see immediate response in the temporal world. When we see our temporal privileges as a sign of God’s approval, we are too short-sighted. God DOES bless some now, because He chooses to do so. That was Jesus’ warning about presumption – and we need to revisit it again and again. Often we don’t see the world through His eyes.

Again, we must say it plainly, so it is not lost in Christian verbiage: Jesus wants His followers to see ourselves as entirely undeserving of His great invitation – and know that God chooses to work among the least, not the greatest.

The Call of True Invitation (Luke 14:25-35)

Luke attached another story directly after the banquet, and the language is not as clear in the original text as the English translation. It may be that the story is not AFTER Jesus left the room, but from the atrium of the home as they listened. This may be a story from the same setting, and the crowds “going along with Him” may be an expression of agreement, not a statement of travel. We simply cannot tell. Luke wrote:

Luke 14:25 Now large crowds were going along with Him; and He turned and said to them, 26 “If anyone comes to Me, and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be My disciple. 27 “Whoever does not carry his own cross and come after Me cannot be My disciple. 28 “For which one of you, when he wants to build a tower, does not first sit down and calculate the cost to see if he has enough to complete it? 29 “Otherwise, when he has laid a foundation and is not able to finish, all who observe it begin to ridicule him, 30 saying, ‘This man began to build and was not able to finish.’ 31 “Or what king, when he sets out to meet another king in battle, will not first sit down and consider whether he is strong enough with ten thousand [men] to encounter the one coming against him with twenty thousand? 32 “Or else, while the other is still far away, he sends a delegation and asks for terms of peace. 33 “So then, none of you can be My disciple who does not give up all his own possessions. 34 “Therefore, salt is good; but if even salt has become tasteless, with what will it be seasoned? 35 “It is useless either for the soil or for the manure pile; it is thrown out. He who has ears to hear, let him hear.”

There are two distinct parts to what Jesus said in this teaching, and both are tough but clear.

The first part we will extract from the middle of the text – the need to seriously count the cost before hastily agreeing to follow Jesus (14:28-32). His words to illustrate this truth were in pictures:

• There was a picture of a tower builder, who did not assess the total cost of the project, but had to stop half-way because of insufficient funds. He brought ridicule on himself by laying a foundation, but finding it impossible to finish.

• There was a picture of a ruler who bounded into battle without carefully considering whether his army could stand up to the fight against a larger army. He should have looked for a negotiated solution, but acted without forethought.

In our haste to offer Jesus to people as the answer for their momentary problem, we need to be careful not to remove the demands that Jesus places on His followers, and we need to heed the warnings He gave about considering the cost. We cannot simply offer new life in Christ without its requisite life surrender. When we do so, we are offering only part of the Biblical message. When we do so, we offer a message different than Jesus Himself offered. We must ask people to consider both the benefits of the Gospel and the demands of it as well. The Good News is that God has made a way for me to have a relationship with Him through Christ’s payment. The Good News is that God will declare me righteous because a Righteous One died in place of my death for my sin. The Good News is NOT that there is nothing God expects from me but a few words muttered under my breath at a Crusade or church service. He wants ME to surrender to HIM. If that is not included in the message, how can someone count the cost before they begin to claim Jesus as their Savior? No matter how one approaches the theology here, all believers of every stripe will agree that God’s plain desire is that His followers to yield to His direction – to do what He says. Some may think they can present Jesus without the message of surrender, but they will eventually have to agree that must be reckoned with before one is truly doing what God wants. Follower means that I… follow. How can someone know that is God’s desire and make an informed decision if that is not part of the message of the Gospel we preach?

The second are the tough conditions for becoming and remaining a disciple of Jesus (14:26-27 and 33). Jesus mentioned four specifics:

First, the area was surrendered relationships. He included parents, children and siblings. The simple question Jesus left us to answer is this: “Is there any relationship so important that I would not allow my Savior to direct me in it? Is there any relationship more important than my obedience to Him? If I cannot say without a doubt that all relationships are subject to my Master’s direction – I cannot claim I am His disciple. I simply can’t.

Second, Jesus included the follower’s own life. Jesus wanted it clear that His followers didn’t own their own lives – He did. He could call them to far flung places for His purpose, or place them, in His plan, in a hospital ward to be a witness for Him. Any follower who wants veto rights for his own life hasn’t surrendered that life. Jesus offered little to the one who wanted eternal life but also ownership of his own life – He simply said they CANNOT be my disciple.

Third, the area of life direction was made clear. Jesus expects followers to give up choices in life direction, and follow Him in the path He guides. If we think we are Christian, but are making the choices for our life without His guiding hand and our humble submission, we are not. A disciple doesn’t dictate terms to his teacher – he follows directions. He listens to God’s path and then follows it. That includes marriage choices, career choices, school choices, parenting choices, new homes, new cars, new jobs – all of it. Either we are deliberately and consciously following Jesus’ direction or we are not – and we may be the only one who truly knows if we are or not.

Fourth, the area of possessions was highlighted. Jesus clearly outlined that any who follow Him would stop possessing the things in their life, and would deliberately surrender them to the Savior. That surrender of the use of anything God provided for my life comes as a natural byproduct of giving up my direction, health and relationships. Either the stuff in my life is His to take away or increase – or it is mine. Jesus made clear if it is mine, I am not His disciple.

I keep reading about people that posit the term “Christian” and “disciple” are not interchangeable – as if one can begin to follow Jesus for salvation, surrender nothing, and yet claim to be one of His. The problem is, that doesn’t seem to have Biblical support. It may make us feel better by suggesting a lesser standard – but the two terms appear to be used interchangeably in the text. The term “disciples” occurs 269 times in the Christian Scriptures, but the term “Christian” occurs a mere three (3) times.

Luke recorded: “The disciples were first called Christians at Antioch” (Acts 11:26). This suggests the early believers used the terms to mean the same thing. The hard part is the implication: if the two words mean the same thing in the usage of Jesus, when He said “you cannot be My disciple” He was also saying “you cannot call yourself a Christian”. If that sounds too harsh, consider the meaning of Christian as “little Christ” or “follower of Christ” – and it seems clearer. Jesus’ words in 14:27, “Anyone who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple” could also be phrased as “Anybody who does not carry his cross and follow me cannot be a Christian.” When I say it that way it not only gets my attention more, it clarifies how serious the issue was to the Master.

When Luke introduced the crowd in the beginning, he noted several things about them. First, they were large, and second they were “going along after Him.” Jesus “turned to them” and taught on being a disciple. He didn’t drop into their lives – they were already curiously following Him around to observe what the fuss was all about. They weren’t antagonistic towards the Master, nor uninterested in His presentation. In “going along after Him” they seemed to be positive in their attitude toward Him, but not yet a part of His discipleship group. Like many today, they apparently mistook a positive attitude toward Jesus and some curious interest in Jesus for discipleship. They were certainly casual fans, but not committed followers.

So many in our time are like them – willing to quote Jesus when He says something warm and comforting, but unwilling to explore any teaching that would present a high cost to their prized personal freedom. They would be willing to give Him an hour on Sunday, a hymn, acknowledgement at a friend’s funeral, and a thirty second recitation of prayer before eating. Look at what Jesus truly required. No relationship could be more important. We couldn’t cling even to our own life as more significant than His direction. Our stuff is placed in His hands. Our direction for the few years of life we have are placed in His care.

Oswald Chambers put it this way: “The religion of Jesus is the religion of a little child. There is no affectation about a disciple of Jesus, he is as a little child, amazingly simple but unfathomably deep. Many of us are not childlike enough, we are childish.

We must recite the words yet again: Jesus wants His followers to recognize that we own nothing. We possess nothing. Our relationships are subject to Him, as is even our own breath. We are His and not our own. There simply is no selfish form of disciple – that is a myth. Followers surrender and the un-surrendered aren’t truly following.

Shortly after coming to Christ, Sadhu Sundar, a Hindu convert to Christ, felt called to become a missionary to India. Late one afternoon Sadhu was traveling on foot through the Himalayas with a Buddhist monk. It was bitterly cold and the wind felt like sharp blades slicing into Sadhu’s skin. Night was approaching fast when the monk warned Sadhu that they were in danger of freezing to death if they did not reach the monastery before darkness fell. Just as they were traversing a narrow path above a steep cliff, they heard a cry for help. Down the cliff lay a man, fallen and badly hurt. The monk looked at Sadhu and said, “Do not stop. God has brought this man to his fate. He must work it out for himself.” The he quickly added while walking on, “Let us hurry on before we , too, perish.” But Sadhu replied, “God has sent me here to help my brother. I cannot abandon him.” The monk continued trudging off through the whirling snow, while the missionary clambered down the steep embankment. The man’s leg was broken and he could not walk. So Sadhu took his blanket and made a sling of it and tied the man on his back. Then, bending under his burden, he began a body-torturing climb. By the time he reached the narrow path again, he was drenched in perspiration. Doggedly, he made his way through the deepening snow and darkness. It was all he could do to follow the path. But he persevered, though faint with fatigue and overheated from exertion. Finally he saw ahead the lights of the monastery. Then, for the first time, Sadhu stumbled and nearly fell. But not from weakness. He had stumbled over an object lying in the snow-covered road. Slowly he bent down on one knee and brushed the snow off the object. It was the body of the monk, frozen to death. (Taken from Sermon Central illustrations).

Jesus made it clear: those who love their life lose it. Those who yield it to Him gain life beyond their own compare. The problem is that not everyone understands what He said. Why? You have to know the teacher to understand His message.

Following His Footsteps: “Master Storyteller” (Part Two) – Luke 14-16

Brothers GrimmOne of the lost arts of our day is that of good storytelling. For generations, people huddled around the hearth and heard tales passed from mouth to ear. Some were famous tales that survived over-alteration, and came from places like those from the collection of the Brothers Grimm. Jacob (1785–1863) and Wilhelm (1786–1859), were German scholars who collected and published folklore during the early 19th century. They popularized stories such as “Cinderella”, “Hansel and Gretel”, “Rapunzel”, “Rumpelstiltskin” and “Snow White”. Their first collection was published in 1812, and they have been retold countless times.

Many storytellers offered their tales because of the moral they taught the listeners – for storytelling can be a powerful way to transmit a world view and moral system. If you follow the trail back through history, one of the profound moralist storytellers was Jesus, Who used that very medium to explain some weighty truths about God and walking with Him. Jesus seems to have truly enjoyed telling stories – it didn’t matter if it were of plants, fish, rocks or gardens – He had a tale from which He could make eternal truth graspable for the average listener. Unfortunately, as time has passed and cultural references have changed, some of His best material seems dulled from its original luster.

In fact, I would argue that sometimes we struggle to follow God when we know what He has told us to do – it is a battle of the will. Yet, other times we honestly struggle to understand the record God left us in His word – and that can happen easily in grasping the truth from a story told by Jesus. We won’t do what we should and won’t avoid what we must if we don’t understand what Jesus taught about God, life, others and surrender. Some training in His time and the method of storytelling of long ago is essential to properly grasping His message….

Key Principle: We must learn to listen carefully to the storyteller to truly understand His message.

In this lesson, we return to parables as the medium through which Heavenly truths will be unfolded by God, as He taught in human skin from a hillside in the Galilee two thousand years ago. Though this isn’t a CLASS, it is a learning situation, and I want to carefully suggest that learning the pattern of a parable can keep us from extracting the wrong ideas from the Gospel accounts. A casual search of YouTube will reveal that many don’t seem to understand how to get the central truths from the stories recorded in the New Testament – so this is worth our time and attention.

There are three stories that Jesus went on to present to people that we want to look at briefly in this lesson. Each has been misunderstood and misapplied because the form they were delivered in was unfamiliar to the one teaching each passage. We want to understand parables, and get a particular grasp on how to get the intended truth from them the Teacher offered. The three parables are:

• The Parable of Joy in a string of three stories,
• The Parable of the Shrewd Learner (along with application teachings),
• The Parable of Sufficient Revelation.

For the moment, let’s rehearse the biggest principle in dealing with parables. The rule is this: Let the main thing be the main thing, and let the details fall away. No parable is intended to teach a dozen principles – that isn’t how the form was used by the rabbis of yesteryear. Don’t apply YOUR rules to the text – apply the rules of the people in the original situation. Let me illustrate this once more with the first well known parable string with three stories.

The Parable of Joy

We have explored this story a number of times in the past, but each opportunity in a passage is a new mix of listeners, so let’s stop and think through the scene, the string and the Savior’s key principle. The text is Luke 15…

The story opens with the setting that defines the need and true audience for the teaching. Luke 15:1 “Now all the tax collectors and the sinners were coming near Him to listen to Him. 2 Both the Pharisees and the scribes [began] to grumble, saying, “This man receives sinners and eats with them.” 3 So He told them this parable, saying

These verses tell us clearly three things:

First, broken people and people with reputations came to Jesus – and He was approachable.

Second, religious leaders thought that Jesus’ approachability was a terrible quality, because it signaled at the least compromise and at the most outright sinful acceptance of those who should be shunned.

Third, Jesus chose to tell a story to make the point to the grumblers. That is a key. Jesus didn’t teach the three stories of the “Parable of Joy” to get broken people to learn about God’s love. He didn’t teach them to people with bad reputations to get them to understand how to clean up their lives. If the hearts of people such as these were moved, it was secondary. Jesus was responding to religious grumblers, and that sets the landscape of the teaching.

Jesus told three stories in the string: a story of a lost sheep, a story of a lost coin, and a story of a lost son. The first story referenced a man on his job. The second story was about a woman in her home. The third story was about a broken-hearted parent and two fussing siblings. In the end, Jesus included almost everyone in his audience – men, women, parents, children. Think through each story and the pattern of “something lost” followed by “something found” responded properly to by “JOY!”

In verses 4-7, Jesus used the shepherd’s craft to explain the story…

Luke 15:4 “What man among you, if he has a hundred sheep and has lost one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the open pasture and go after the one which is lost until he finds it? 5 “When he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing.” 6 “And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors, saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost!’ 7 “I tell you that in the same way, there will be [more] joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance.

The pattern is clear: a sheep lost, a sheep found, a celebration of joy ensues. The message is simple: “When that which is lost is found, JOY is the natural result.” Jesus made the point that HEAVEN REJOICES when sinners return – because that is what redemption is all about.

The second story of the string is found in verses 8 to 10, this time in a home with a woman who lost what was likely one of her prized dowry coins.

Luke 15:8 “Or what woman, if she has ten silver coins and loses one coin, does not light a lamp and sweep the house and search carefully until she finds it? 9 “When she has found it, she calls together her friends and neighbors, saying, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found the coin which I had lost!’ 10 “In the same way, I tell you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner who repents.

Again the pattern is clear – if you are listening carefully: a coin is lost, the coin is recovered, neighbors are invited to share a celebration of JOY. Again, angels are taking joy over the recovered sinner. Again the message: “When that which was lost is found, JOY should be the result!”

The final story is told of a father and his two sons in verse 11 to 32. Look closely at the text. You will see the cast of characters is verse 11. In verse 12 you will be surprised at the insolence of a rebellious and restless son. In verse 13 you watch as he journeys away, and in verse 14 you watch as he throws away all that came to him in inheritance. By verse 15 you can see his desperation in the word “impoverished”. In verse 16 – 19 we see the boy hungry, standing in pig slop, dreaming of home and rehearsing his shame before his father in his mind.

The turning point of the story can be found in verse 20, because the boy came to his senses and went home. His father raced out to him as the boy attempted to humble himself in verse 21, but his father was busy hugging and preparing a celebration. Stop. Don’t get caught in the details… in the pattern IS the point. The pattern was a son lost, a son found… now enter the detail that DOESN’T FIT. Something is wrong in the end of the story…

Luke 15:25 “Now his older son was in the field, and when he came and approached the house, he heard music and dancing. 26 “And he summoned one of the servants and [began] inquiring what these things could be. 27 “And he said to him, ‘Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fattened calf because he has received him back safe and sound.’ 28 “But he became angry and was not willing to go in; and his father came out and [began] pleading with him. 29 “But he answered and said to his father, ‘Look! For so many years I have been serving you and I have never neglected a command of yours; and [yet] you have never given me a young goat, so that I might celebrate with my friends; 30 but when this son of yours came, who has devoured your wealth with prostitutes, you killed the fattened calf for him.’ 31 “And he said to him, ‘Son, you have always been with me, and all that is mine is yours. 32 But we had to celebrate and rejoice, for this brother of yours was dead and [has begun] to live, and [was] lost and has been found.'”

Look at the older brother. He is the religious moaner from the beginning of the story. He wasn’t happy with an approachable Teacher – he wasn’t excited about broken people being restored to God. He was angry and grumbling. God was forgiving, and that never sits well with someone who has worked so hard to do the right thing. It feels like the one who did wrong got all the same benefits but didn’t have to work so hard at it!

The truth is the Pharisee didn’t have any idea how hard it was to be the lost son. He didn’t know the inner price that someone pays in becoming crushed by their own rebellion. He did right, and he didn’t have much in the way fo patience for someone who didn’t work as hard at righteousness. He saw his discipline as work, and their moral sloppiness as a short cut. He couldn’t feel what it was like to walk in the dark places the lost son knew all too well. The Pharisee didn’t understand the deep inner shame the broken boy brought to his father.

The point of the parable is simple: When that which is lost is found, joy should be the result. If that is NOT what happens, something is wrong with our heart. People who know God should celebrate broken people being restored to God, and value them as much as they do those who never walked away. I believe without a doubt that was the heart of what Jesus wanted to say.

Let me be clear: I have heard this taught many times about the father’s love – but I don’t believe that was Jesus’ intent at all. I have heard it taught about the boy’s need to come to his senses and repent – and it made a great Gospel appeal – but I don’t think that was Jesus’ point at all – and I believe taking the main point from the details of a parable is both WRONG and DANGEROUS. Let me prove my point as we explore in Luke 16…

The Parable of the Shrewd Learner

Jesus offered yet another parable. Look carefully at the setting, because you will again see the principle in light of the setting and some knowledge of those to whom the teaching was directed…

Luke 16:1 Now He was also saying to the disciples, “There was a rich man who had a manager, and this [manager] was reported to him as squandering his possessions.

Jesus was addressing His followers (not grumbling Pharisees) and trying to make a singular point – but you have to read the whole thing with that ONE POINT in mind. Keep reading…

Luke 16:2 “And he called him and said to him, ‘What is this I hear about you? Give an accounting of your management, for you can no longer be manager.’ 3 “The manager said to himself, ‘What shall I do, since my master is taking the management away from me? I am not strong enough to dig; I am ashamed to beg. 4 I know what I shall do, so that when I am removed from the management people will welcome me into their homes.’ 5 “And he summoned each one of his master’s debtors, and he [began] saying to the first, ‘How much do you owe my master?’ 6 “And he said, ‘A hundred measures of oil.’ And he said to him, ‘Take your bill, and sit down quickly and write fifty.’ 7 “Then he said to another, ‘And how much do you owe?’ And he said, ‘A hundred measures of wheat.’ He said to him, ‘Take your bill, and write eighty.’

What the man appeared to be doing was cheating his master, but that wasn’t the point of the story. Jesus made clear that the man did what he did to PLAN AHEAD, and that was exactly what his master saw that was lacking in the poor manager. The man who owned the loans was less concerned about getting back all that was owed than he was at the fact that his affairs were in the hands of a man who didn’t plan ahead, and haplessly fell into situations rather than being proactive.

Let’s see if we can pick out the main point in Jesus’ teachings in verses 8 and 9:

Luke 16:8 “And his master praised the unrighteous manager because he had acted shrewdly; for the sons of this age are more shrewd in relation to their own kind than the sons of light. 9″And I say to you, make friends for yourselves by means of the wealth of unrighteousness, so that when it fails, they will receive you into the eternal dwellings.

Don’t lose focus here – this saying is hard to unravel. Jesus was trying to make the point that shrewd dealings and careful planning seemed to be lacking in His followers. There is TRUST in God’s provision, and then there is presumptive laziness. There is confidence in the Lord, and there is hubris in throwing all back on God as the owner. Jesus wanted the disciples to know that they needed to learn to be shrewd. They needed to learn to use the things of this world to promote eternal purposes. Things here will melt away – but they are given to us to steward and we must not waste them. Look at verse 9 and read it slowly. Jesus said that His disciples should make friends in the here and now and use the temporal, physical wealth (referred to as “wealth of unrighteousness”).

These words sound confusing, as if Jesus is suggesting bank robbery or some ill-gotten gain – but that is not in view at all. The translation of a common Hebrew expression (used in Targumim by other rabbis) contrasts the word “unrighteous,” against “the true riches” in Luke 16:11, and means “not real, not permanent, not to be trusted.”

When moved from Hebrew and Aramaic by teachers, it often sounds funny and requires explanation, as in 1 Timothy 6:17.

1 Timothy 6:17 “Instruct those who are rich in this present world not to be conceited or to fix their hope on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly supplies us with all things to enjoy.”

The point is the money and physical goods of the earth are not to be wasted as the steward had done, but used for God Who supplies them. At the same time, they represent property that is “deceitful” and not to be trusted as any permanent sign of success. In fact, if you look at the three teachings that follow the parable, you can see this even more clearly…

Three Teachings on Temporal Wealth

Lesser and Greater Wealth

Jesus said that physical wealth is a LESSER thing, but spiritual wealth is a GREATER thing. If God cannot trust us with money, He won’t trust us with souls. He said:

Luke 16:10 “He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much. 11 “Therefore if you have not been faithful in the [use of] unrighteous wealth, who will entrust the true [riches] to you? 12 “And if you have not been faithful in [the use of] that which is another’s, who will give you that which is your own?

It is the responsibility of the followers of Jesus to steward properly the temporal riches to be given access to the greater riches that pay in eternity. Do you want to see God at work in and through you this year? Jesus said the place to start is stewarding well the time, talent and treasure God had already given you.

Choosing to Serve

Jesus also warned that temporal wealth and eternal values will, at some point, part company. Each will pull our hearts, but the directions are not compatible. He said:

Luke 16:13 “No servant can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth.”

It is the responsibility of every believer to serve God with their temporal things, not make their temporal wealth into their God.

The Cloaked Greedy Ones

While Jesus was speaking, the Pharisees were making fun of Him. Jesus made clear their real issue was their heart – and their handling of His cousin John the Baptizer showed they wanted to keep their place at the expense of standing for truth. Luke reminded:

Luke 16:14 Now the Pharisees, who were lovers of money, were listening to all these things and were scoffing at Him. 15 And He said to them, “You are those who justify yourselves in the sight of men, but God knows your hearts; for that which is highly esteemed among men is detestable in the sight of God. 16 “The Law and the Prophets [were proclaimed] until John; since that time the gospel of the kingdom of God has been preached, and everyone is forcing his way into it. 17 “But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one stroke of a letter of the Law to fail. 18 “Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery.

Don’t get thrown off by the divorce comment – it related to John’s preaching that got him arrested. The Pharisees knew Herod Antipas was wrong for stealing his brother’s wife and putting the kingdom in jeopardy with a war – and all that was going on in the background of the news at that time. This was a simple reference to what everyone knew after John’s vicious death. Jesus’ point was simple: “You men know John was right morally, yet you did nothing to risk your positions for truth. Don’t look now, but your compromise is showing your underlying greed!”

The point of the whole story and the teachings is not cloudy: Jesus wanted His disciples to learn to use and not waste material things with shrewdness and planning – in order to maximize the eternal benefits. Wealth in the here and now is temporary, but it can be used for things that produced lasting benefits if we don’t walk off into our monastery and deny ourselves any contact with what God provided for our use. Stewarding things can be God’s test bridge to stewarding lives – when we don’t fall in love with things, serve things and compromise to keep things that will melt away at our last heart beat anyway.

Don’t forget. The only way you will not end up at the wrong place in the teaching is to allow the main thing to be the only thing Jesus was teaching. If the details of a parable are the point, even a little bit, you could end up teaching that Jesus liked the deception of the manager – and that isn’t true at all. The main thing was the shrewd stewardship, not the “markdown process” on the bills he used.

The Rich Man and Lazarus

The third and final story for this lesson is the well-known story of a rich man who came from a family that did not trust the testimony of the Scriptures, and died having trusted in the riches of this life as a symbol of God’s acceptance for the next. Jesus told the story:

Luke 16:19 “Now there was a rich man, and he habitually dressed in purple and fine linen, joyously living in splendor every day. 20 “And a poor man named Lazarus was laid at his gate, covered with sores, 21 and longing to be fed with the [crumbs] which were falling from the rich man’s table; besides, even the dogs were coming and licking his sores. 22 “Now the poor man died and was carried away by the angels to Abraham’s bosom; and the rich man also died and was buried. 23 “In Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and saw Abraham far away and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 “And he cried out and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus so that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool off my tongue, for I am in agony in this flame.’ 25 “But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that during your life you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted here, and you are in agony. 26 And besides all this, between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and [that] none may cross over from there to us.’ 27 “And he said, ‘Then I beg you, father, that you send him to my father’s house—28 for I have five brothers– in order that he may warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’ 29 “But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.’ 30 “But he said, ‘No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!’ 31 “But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.‘”

The rich man in verse 19 lived a life of opulence and dressed his part. A poor man named Lazarus (whose name is from Eleazar, or “God is my help”) lay outside the gate of his villa eating the cast off scraps from his table, according to verse 20-21. Lazarus was sickly and sore-ridden, and eventually died – as did the rich man – as told in verse 22.

Jesus awkwardly juxtaposed the rich man in torment and Lazarus in comfort. Note that in verse 24, the rich man thought Lazarus should still be brought into the position of service to HIM. Father Abraham’s reply was telling: “You had a life of comfort while Lazarus suffered – he cannot come and help you now (16:25-26). The rich man begged that Lazarus be ordered to go to the house of the rich man’s family and warn the living of their end to come – a sort of Dicken’s ghost to an Ebenezer Scrooge. Father Abraham offers but one observation – “If they don’t believe the Word of God as provided, they will not believe one back from the dead!”

Remember, the point of these stories is always found in the setting. Jesus was speaking in front of two groups – the disciples and the Pharisees. One group was learning; the other was scoffing. Despite what you may have read – every evidence in the text is that this is NOT an account of the afterlife – it is a story. For one thing, Abraham isn’t a gatekeeper in eternity any more than Peter will meet you at the pearly gates. This was a parable – and the main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing. The introduction of a name with meaning doesn’t change the fact that it was a mere story. In the afterlife, those who are comforted don’t watch the torment of others – that was a detail like the way the unjust steward figured out how to make friends… stick to the point.

Jesus taught that the testimony of the Scripture was enough to lead people who are open-hearted to a right relationship with God. He was going to be the “dead man” that rose in the days ahead – but that wouldn’t be MORE if they wouldn’t believe the testimony of God’s Holy Word. The Pharisees that didn’t believe the LIVING WORD standing before them, nor truly grasp the Written Word provided them would later resist the RISEN WORD that would be revealed. That was Jesus’ point, and it all came to be as He promised.

It is essential that we recognize that we must learn to listen carefully to the storyteller to truly understand His message.

If we allow the details to distract us, we will be led into the stories that teach an ethic different than the Scriptures…

Look at what Jesus taught in this lesson – and clear out the details to get the key principles that change the way we think.

First, He said that JOY should come to the people of God when one who wandered from God is broken by life and returns into His arms. If we aren’t joyful about that – something is WRONG with us. Jesus’ people are to be those who hurt for the wanderers and rejoice with each who find their way home – safely into a relationship with God. One of the unintended consequences of living the truths of Scripture is that they will make us FEEL DESERVING of God’s love, welling up pride where there should be nothing but humble gratitude. Do I care about the wanderers? Am I more concerned about how their sin keeps them from God, or how they mess up my country? My inner Pharisee can quickly show – and I need to replace the sense of justice with the truth of undeserved mercy.

Second, Jesus taught that His followers need to become shrewd and careful stewards of the temporal things for eternal purposes. They don’t need to spurn riches of this world, nor serve riches of this world; they need to use them for things that will matter in the time after life’s days on earth are over. Do I love the things of this world more than the eternal purposes of God? Are my dreams about acquiring things that will one day slip away in an estate sale after I am gone from here? Do I see the value of what God has put in my hands – my time, my talent and my treasure – to be able to use them for His glory?

Third, Jesus taught that people in this world need to carefully heed the Scriptures concerning who they are, and what their end will be. If they refuse the Scriptures, the miraculous change that Scrooge made after the three visitors will be the exception – not the rule. Each time I hear God’s voice and don’t submit, a callous grows upon my heart. I become more resistant to listening. Not only that, but like the rich man, I become someone who believes I have obtained some modest riches in this life because I am BETTER than some other poor soul in some destitute village. It is a lie. I live with good things, but I am not good inside. I am self-willed, arrogant, and smug. I need to see myself in the mirror of God’s Word – a man in desperate need of the mercy of God, deserving nothing.

I am often reminded of one of Robert Frost’s sayings about our world: “Half the world is composed of people who have something to say and can’t, while the other half have nothing to say and keep on saying it!” We need to approach words with care or real communication will not result.

The humorbin.com offers some encouraging thoughts on miscommunication that help set the serious tone of this teaching back into our own mixed up daily lives… They wrote:

Cracking an international market is a goal of most growing corporations. It shouldn’t be that hard, yet even the big multinationals run into trouble because of language and cultural differences. For example:

• In Taiwan, the translation of the Pepsi slogan “Come alive with the Pepsi Generation” came out as “Pepsi will bring your ancestors back from the dead.”

• In Chinese, the Kentucky Fried Chicken slogan “finger-lickin’ good” came out as “you will eat your fingers off.”

• Years ago, when General Motors introduced the Chevy Nova in South America, it was apparently unaware that “no va” means “it won’t go.” After the company figured out why it wasn’t selling any cars, it renamed the car in its Spanish markets to the Caribe.

• When Parker Pen marketed a ball-point pen in Mexico, its ads were supposed to say: “It won’t leak in your pocket and embarrass you.” However, through mistranlation the ads actually said: “It won’t leak in your pocket and make you pregnant.”

These are examples of failed communication that should make us both SMILE, and take our task seriously when we open the Word. Our Savior had profound truths to tell us in his stories – but we must become students of the parable to grasp what they meant – or we could get the wrong impression – and that could make for real trouble! Wrong teaching can come from wrong listening.